Score: 7

"Second of the trilogy"

submission: Riddle School 2

date: August 13, 2008

GOOD: Major improvement since your last one. You got better music, more animation, attempts at humour and made it longer. I will admit, I got stuck a few times. This also brings back memories when I collected coins in the hallways.

BAD: Some overused audio in your flash.

IMPROVE: Already improved since your last one.

OVERALL: A major improvement since your last one. I got stuck a few times and had to use your walkthrough on your site. Some of the music is annoying and overused but still improved. I got a few kicks out of your attempt at humour. I'll start reviewing your third one.

Score: 5

"First of the trilogy"

submission: Riddle School

date: August 13, 2008

GOOD: I love school adventure games. It was an interesting game for beginners.

BAD: Far too short once you know how and has poor replay-ability. I also hated the music.

IMPROVE: You already improved on your sequels.

OVERALL: It's an OK game with an interesting concept. This is a good introduction for the trilogy to get people to get used to the game concepts. Not really much to offer other than that. I'll get right to reviewing your sequels.

Score: 2

"Meh, needs alot of work."

submission: The Sicksons

date: August 1, 2008

GOOD: The animations were acceptable and the part where Lisa has a Satanic heads had me laughing.

BAD: The voices were annoying, Bart's design was poorly done and the jokes were pretty bland and immature.

IMPROVE: If this was deliberately bad, then don't bother reading this section. Bart's design looks incredibly lazy so you could fix up his design and make it more like him instead of a quick sketch of him. Finding better jokes would be a good idea because the jokes here were pretty childish.

I cannot stress enough on improving the voice acting. The voice acting is the biggest thing to work on. Marge entering was pretty poorly done so you could add in more animation on that scene. If you plan to do another one, try to improve and if you do, make it longer.

OVERALL: It's was a flop in my opinion. Unless this was deliberately poorly made, you could work on a lot of things. I liked you making fun of Lisa because she's pretty annoying and I'm sure you have the potential to make a better one. In other words, try to make a serious attempt.

Score: 8

"Dance!"

submission: South Park Caramelldansen

date: June 20, 2008

GOOD: I love South Park and this made me laugh. It's a good reason why I never want the Japanese to animate my favorite shows. The animation ran smoothly and it was a silly parody to the Caramel Dansen video along with lots of other spoofs.

BAD: None

IMPROVE: I would love to see the others characters dance!

OVERALL: It's so damn addicting that it's not funny. I loved seeing them dance and even caught myself dancing a bit like them. It's a good spoof and if you did a collection of it with different characters it would be cool. It's simple but enjoyable. Good job.

Score: 8

"Funny and Informative for certain groups."

submission: Pocahontas BURNED

date: June 11, 2008

GOOD: As a historian, I must say, good job at pointing out the inaccuracies while making them humorous. The scene where they were all, "Blah blah blah, blah blah, blah." Got me laughing because that it was it would be like realistically. Some of the other jokes put a smile to my face as well.

BAD: Seems a little over the top considering it's a children's movie and some scenes seemed a little lazy.

IMPROVE: First, some of the scenes could use background and color to make it more visually appealing.

OVERALL: It's a funny movie that history geeks like me would enjoy but keep in mind that the movie was made for children and I seriously doubt small children will care much for historical accuracy. Still, good job at this. I never realized some of these inaccuracies until I first saw this flash in 2005 and I would be interested to see another flash like this with another historical Disney movie.

Score: 10

"Excellent"

submission: Chuck's New Tux!

date: May 29, 2008

GOOD: The graphics, sound, synching, everythning was TV quality. It was very cartoony like and the ending had me laughing out loud.

BAD: None

IMPROVE: None

OVERALL: Very cheesy cartoon. I didn't expect the ending which had me laughing out loud. I loved how it was like a cartoon you'd see on TV nowadays. Good Job.

Score: 6

"Could use some work."

submission: V for Vendetta: Vigilante

date: May 24, 2008

GOOD: Good graphics that give it a good feeling to it. I loved V for Vendetta and it's nice that there's a flash for it.

BAD: The voice acting was pretty rusty because V sounded like Darth Vader and the person selling lambchops sounded computerized. There were also a few spelling errors I noticed in the flash and some of the animation was a bit choppy.

IMPROVE: The voice acting should get major work on it for the most part and try to fix the spelling mistakes in case of grammar Nazis on the loose. The animation where V's cape, hat and mask fall down is very choppy and could be improved to make it work more.

OVERALL: This was a decent flash movie. It was short but enjoyable for fans of V for Vendetta. Sure, it may be a little rusty on some parts but who knows, maybe you will make an improved one. You have the potential.

Score: 9

"Excellent"

submission: House of 1000 Cats

date: May 12, 2008

GOOD: The music fits perfectly with the story and the graphics seemed good enough. I laughed when Tom fell flat inside on landing on his feet like everyone else and I liked how you introduced a new character to Newgrounds from Newgrounds' craziest new products into the action. The flashback was a nice touch and I'm sure the Kitty Krew is proud of being featured in a flash that won $3,000.

BAD: The voice acting was horrible and the explosion sounds were rather fuzzy sounding.

IMPROVE: Well, all I can say is try using better voice acting next time and maybe fix the explosion sounds. I found them to be rather annoying.

OVERALL: Congrats on a well-earned cash from a well-made flash. Be sure to spend your cash wisely. I really liked the music this flash chose and I enjoyed watching. Just try using some clearer explosion sounds and work on the voice acting.

Score: 10

"Excellent"

submission: What is Love?

date: May 8, 2008

GOOD: Great song and the cartoon was great with it. The synching was good and it was pretty funny at times. I also liked how there is a secret clip and you have to play a little eye-spy to get to it.

BAD: None

IMPROVE: None

OVERALL: It was an excellent flash that had me laughing while watching. I really like the song so it suits the story. Good luck on the Tank Awards!

Score: 9

"I remember this!"

submission: Osama: Nowhere To Run

date: May 6, 2008

GOOD: This brings back memories of this whole madness back in 2001. The flash as original for its time and better than your average 2001 flash. The song was funny and this was the first flash depicting Osama Bin Laden that I have ever witnessed.

BAD: None

IMPROVE: None

OVERALL: I remember this being plastered all over the internet back in 2001. It was the first flash with Osama that I have ever seen and it's still cool after all these years. Excellent job!